Selling a business in India in 2026 requires owners and promoters to navigate three questions at once: what the business is worth given India’s specific sector growth premium, who across domestic and international buyer pools has genuine acquisition capacity, and how the 2024 capital gains tax changes affect deal structure. Owners who resolve all three before approaching buyers consistently achieve better outcomes than those who negotiate directly with the first interested party.
Lyndon Advisory advises Indian business owners and promoters on sell-side M&A transactions from approximately ₹200 crore enterprise value. This guide covers the sale process, tax treatment, valuation benchmarks, and buyer landscape for mid-market owners.
| LTCG on unlisted shares | 12.5% on gains (effective 23 July 2024, Finance Act 2024); 24-month holding period for long-term treatment |
| STCG on unlisted shares | Applicable income tax slab rate (up to 30% + surcharge) |
| CCI approval threshold | Combined India assets > ₹2,000 crore or combined India turnover > ₹6,000 crore |
| Sale timeline | Twelve to twenty months for most mid-market transactions |
| EBITDA multiples | 5–20x depending on sector and buyer type |
| Key buyer types | Domestic PE, international PE (KKR/Blackstone/Warburg), Japanese strategics, US/European corporates |
| Success fee structure | Lyndon Advisory: 2% of enterprise value, capped at US$300,000 |
India’s 2024 Capital Gains Tax Changes: What Sellers Must Know
India’s Union Budget 2024 (Finance Act 2024, effective 23 July 2024) made the most significant revision to capital gains tax in a decade. For business owners considering a sale, two changes are most relevant.
Long-term capital gains (LTCG) on unlisted shares:
- The rate was reduced from 20% (with indexation) to 12.5% without indexation.
- For most founders who have held shares for more than twenty-four months, this is broadly neutral to slightly positive: the lower rate compensates for the removal of inflation indexation in most scenarios.
- Exception: assets held for many years with a low cost base may see a higher effective tax under the new rate if indexation would have reduced the taxable gain substantially. Model the specific numbers with your tax advisor.
Short-term capital gains (STCG) on unlisted shares:
- Shares held for less than twenty-four months continue to be taxed at the seller’s applicable income tax slab rate — up to 30% plus applicable surcharge and cess for promoters in the highest bracket.
- In practice, most promoter-owned businesses qualify for LTCG treatment because ownership predates twenty-four months; the slab-rate risk is most relevant for ESOPs, secondary tranches, and shares acquired in recent capital raises.
Asset sale versus share sale:
- Most mid-market Indian transactions are structured as share purchases rather than asset purchases.
- Asset sales trigger separate tax treatment on each asset class: goodwill has been non-depreciable for tax purposes since 2021, and depreciation recapture on written-down assets is taxed as business income.
- Share sales are cleaner for sellers on tax; asset sales allow buyers to step up asset values for depreciation, which some buyers prefer.
- Where both structures are on the table, model both before entering negotiations.
Sellers should obtain a legal and tax opinion from a Big Four India practice before entering a sale process. The above reflects the Finance Act 2024 position; subsequent amendments or interpretive guidance may change the treatment.
EBITDA Multiples by Sector in India (2026)
India commands a meaningful premium over comparable mid-market businesses elsewhere in Asia for high-growth sectors, reflecting investor confidence in Indian growth trajectory, demographic tailwinds, and deep domestic PE competition for quality assets.
| Sector | EBITDA Multiple Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Technology & SaaS | 10–20x+ | Higher for recurring revenue, ARR > ₹50 crore |
| Healthcare services | 12–18x | Hospitals, diagnostics, specialty care; strong PE demand |
| Pharmaceuticals & CRO | 10–16x | Formulations typically higher; API/CDMO sector is active |
| Financial services & fintech | 1.5–3x book value | NBFCs, insurance, payments; regulatory complexity affects multiples |
| Consumer & retail (high-growth brands) | 8–14x | DTC, FMCG; multiple premium for national distribution reach |
| Consumer & retail (stable operations) | 4–7x | Franchises, traditional FMCG; fewer competitive bidders |
| Renewable energy & infrastructure | 8–14x | Contracted cash flows; PE and infrastructure fund appetite strong |
| Industrial & engineering manufacturing | 6–10x | Export-oriented commands premium; domestic-only typically lower |
| Professional services & consulting | 5–9x | Key-person risk discount applied unless succession is structured |
| Logistics & supply chain | 5–9x | 3PL assets with multi-client contracts attract PE interest |
Source: Bain India PE Report 2024, EY India M&A Outlook 2025, dealroom research. Multiples reflect completed mid-market transactions; specific deal outcomes vary by quality of earnings, growth visibility, and competitive process depth.
The Buyer Landscape for Indian Mid-Market Businesses
Effective buyer outreach in India requires reaching four distinct pools simultaneously:
Domestic private equity. Domestic PE is the most active buyer category for profitable businesses with ₹50–500 crore EBITDA. Leading domestic funds — ChrysCapital, Premji Invest, True North, Kedaara Capital, and Multiples — have deep India networks, strong post-investment support, and established relationships with management teams across sectors. They move quickly on well-prepared assets.
International private equity. US and global PE — KKR, Blackstone, Warburg Pincus, Carlyle, General Atlantic, and Advent International — target larger platform acquisitions and high-growth businesses with regional or global scalability. These buyers typically require higher EBITDA scale (₹100 crore+) but bring global operational expertise and deep LP networks for follow-on funding.
Japanese corporate acquirers. Japanese major trading houses (Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Marubeni) and sector-specific corporations are among India’s most active cross-border acquirers. Japan’s ageing demographic and domestic growth constraints make India a strategic priority, particularly in manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, food processing, healthcare, and logistics. Japanese buyers prefer majority or significant minority stakes, move through deliberate internal approval processes, and typically offer stable post-acquisition relationships — a consideration for founders concerned about cultural fit.
US and European strategic acquirers. Technology, pharmaceutical, consumer, and industrial corporates from the US and Europe continue to build India capabilities through acquisition rather than organic buildout. India’s engineering talent, digital infrastructure, and domestic market scale make acquisition an attractive alternative to greenfield investment.
What this means for your sale process: A process that reaches only domestic buyers leaves significant value on the table. International PE and Japanese strategics frequently pay 20–40% premiums over domestic bids where the strategic rationale is strong. Lyndon Advisory structures outreach processes that run all four buyer pools concurrently, creating the competitive tension that drives multiples.
“India has moved from a market where founders accepted the first serious offer to one where a disciplined process — reaching domestic PE, international PE, and Japanese and US strategic buyers simultaneously — creates genuine competitive tension. The gap between a negotiated bilateral deal and a structured process can be 30–50% of enterprise value.” — Daniel Bae, Founder & CEO, Lyndon Advisory (career $30B+ in M&A transactions)
Regulatory Approvals: CCI, FEMA, and Sector Requirements
Competition Commission of India (CCI). Most mid-market transactions fall below CCI thresholds and do not require merger notification. The thresholds trigger at combined Indian assets above ₹2,000 crore or combined worldwide assets above ₹6,000 crore (approximately US$750M). Where CCI filing is required, the Commission typically takes three to six months for non-complex transactions. According to a CCI annual report, approximately 90% of transactions with limited competition concerns receive approval within thirty working days under Phase I review.
RBI and FEMA (Foreign Exchange Management Act). Foreign buyers acquiring shares in Indian companies must comply with FEMA and the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy. Most sectors allow 100% FDI under the automatic route — no prior government approval required, just post-investment reporting to the RBI. Sensitive sectors — defence, media, pharmaceuticals, retail trading, banking, and insurance — require government approval or are subject to sectoral caps. Chinese buyers face additional scrutiny: since 2020, investments from countries sharing a land border with India (including China) require government approval under the Press Note 3/2020 amendment to the FDI Policy, with lengthy review timelines.
Sector-specific approvals. Banking acquisitions require RBI approval. Insurance acquisitions require Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) approval. Telecom sector deals require Department of Telecommunications (DOT) clearance. Pharmaceutical acquisitions may require DPIIT review and, where applicable, CCI approval. Renewable energy and infrastructure transactions involving government-allocated capacity require sector-specific ministry approval.
Practical timeline implication: For transactions requiring multiple approvals, allow eighteen to twenty-four months from deal sign to completion. Your advisor should begin parallel regulatory processes as early as structuring stage, not after LOI signing.
The Sale Process Timeline
| Stage | Typical Duration | Key Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | 2–4 months | Audited financials, EBITDA normalisation, tax opinion, governance clean-up, CIM preparation |
| Buyer outreach | 2–3 months | NDA distribution, teaser, management presentations to shortlisted buyers |
| Indicative offers | 1–2 months | Receive and evaluate non-binding indicative offers; select preferred bidder(s) |
| Exclusivity & due diligence | 2–4 months | Virtual data room, management Q&A, financial and legal DD, quality of earnings |
| Negotiations & SPA | 1–2 months | Share purchase agreement, representations and warranties, completion accounts or locked-box |
| Regulatory approvals | 3–6 months | CCI filing, FEMA reporting, sector approvals (if applicable); can run parallel to SPA negotiation |
| Completion | 0.5–1 month | Funds transfer, share transfer forms, regulatory filings, deferred consideration mechanics |
Total timeline: Twelve to twenty months for straightforward mid-market transactions. Complex regulatory profiles, multiple bidder rounds, or distressed situations can extend to twenty-four months.
Promoter-Specific Considerations
India’s mid-market M&A frequently involves founder-promoters rather than institutionally managed businesses. Buyers — particularly PE funds — pay close attention to promoter-specific risk factors:
- Related-party transactions (RPTs). Group company purchases, family employment, promoter loans, and informal cost-sharing arrangements need to be documented, eliminated, or priced into the deal before PE buyers will commit to a valuation. Undisclosed RPTs discovered in due diligence are a common deal-killer.
- Non-compete and lock-in. Most PE buyers require promoters to remain operationally active for two to three years post-closing and to sign non-compete covenants of two to four years. The scope and geography of non-competes is frequently negotiated.
- Succession and key-person risk. Where the promoter has concentrated relationships with key customers or suppliers, buyers apply a key-person discount to valuation. Demonstrating a professional management team with documented succession capability before entering a process removes this discount.
- Promoter guarantees and contingent liabilities. Historical promoter guarantees for group companies, disputed tax assessments, labour disputes, and environmental liabilities need to be assessed and resolved or indemnified before closing. Buyers expect full disclosure; late discovery triggers price renegotiation.
Preparing a business for sale in India is at minimum a twelve-month process for most mid-market owners. Start with an honest assessment of the above issues before initiating any process.
How to Prepare Your India Business for Sale
- Obtain three years of audited financial statements and a normalised EBITDA bridge that removes owner-specific costs, one-off items, and RPTs.
- Engage a Big Four India tax practice for a deal-structure opinion on share sale versus asset sale, LTCG treatment, and FEMA compliance.
- Resolve or document all related-party transactions, promoter loans, and informal group company arrangements.
- Ensure all IP — trademarks, software, proprietary processes, client contracts — is held in the selling entity, not in the promoter’s personal name or a group company.
- Build a management team capable of operating without the promoter in day-to-day operations; document key customer and supplier relationships through formal contracts.
- Appoint an M&A advisor with demonstrated India cross-border buyer access. A domestic-only process leaves 30–50% of potential value unrealised.
Speak with Lyndon Advisory about a confidential valuation review for your India business.
Public Citations
- Bain India Private Equity Report 2024 — India PE deployed capital, sector multiples, and exit environment.
- EY India M&A Outlook 2025 — sector transaction volumes and cross-border deal activity.
- Competition Commission of India — merger control thresholds and approval timelines.
Related Guides
- How to Sell a Business: The Complete Owner’s Guide
- M&A Advisors in Mumbai: Selling Your Business
- M&A Advisors in Bangalore: Sell Your Business
- India M&A Market 2026: Owner Sale Guide
- How to Sell a Business in Singapore
- How to Sell a Business in Australia
- Business Valuation: What Your Company Is Worth
- Glossary: EBITDA Add-Backs
- Glossary: CIM (Confidential Information Memorandum)
About the Author

Daniel Bae
Co-founder & CEO, Lyndon Advisory
Daniel is an investment banker with 15+ years of experience in M&A, having advised on deals worth over US$30 billion. His career spans Citi, Moelis, Nomura, and ANZ across London, Hong Kong, and Sydney. He holds a combined Commerce/Law degree from the University of New South Wales. Daniel founded Lyndon Advisory to solve the pain points in M&A, enabling bankers to focus on what matters most — delivering trusted advice to clients.
About Lyndon Advisory
Lyndon Advisory is an M&A advisory firm built for Asia Pacific. We help business owners sell their companies and investors make strategic acquisitions with senior-led execution, disciplined process management, and structured buyer research. For owners, the first step is a confidential review of valuation range, likely buyer universe, and whether a structured sell-side process is justified.
Request a confidential seller reviewTopic cluster
Explore this topic
M&A Intelligence
Get M&A insights delivered
Buyer mapping strategies, market analysis, and Asia Pacific M&A insights — straight to your inbox.