The Lehman formula is a tiered M&A advisory fee schedule. A capped success fee is simpler: a stated percentage, subject to a maximum dollar amount. For business owners, the right comparison is not the formula name. It is the total dollars payable, when they are payable, and whether the advisor still provides valuation, CIM, financial model, investment story, targeted buyer outreach, negotiation, diligence, and closing support.
Lyndon Advisory charges 2% of enterprise value, capped at US$300,000, with no retainer, monthly fee, upfront fee, or expense recharge.
For the full owner sale process, read How to Sell a Business.
Quick Comparison
| Fee structure | How it works | Seller issue |
|---|---|---|
| Original Lehman | 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, then 1% by US$1M bands | Often less relevant for modern mid-market deal sizes |
| Modified Lehman | Same descending logic, often by US$10M bands | Can create high dollar fees on US$25M-US$100M deals |
| Double Lehman | Doubles the original bands | Can be expensive for smaller owner-led transactions |
| Capped success fee | Stated percentage with a maximum dollar fee | Easier to model, but scope still matters |
| Retainer plus formula | Monthly fee plus success fee | Seller funds process before closing |
For exact definitions, read the Lehman Formula glossary and M&A Advisor Fee Schedule.
Worked Examples
The most important step is translating every proposal into dollars.
| Enterprise value | Modified Lehman example | Lyndon capped success fee | Difference before retainers |
|---|---|---|---|
| US$10M | US$500,000 | US$200,000 | US$300,000 |
| US$25M | US$1,050,000 | US$300,000 | US$750,000 |
| US$50M | US$1,500,000 | US$300,000 | US$1,200,000 |
| US$100M | US$2,000,000 | US$300,000 | US$1,700,000 |
These examples use a common modified Lehman pattern: 5% of the first US$10M, 4% of the next US$10M, 3% of the next US$10M, 2% of the next US$10M, and 1% above US$40M. Your engagement letter may differ, so calculate the actual schedule rather than relying on the label.
For a downloadable version of these scenarios, use Lyndon’s M&A Advisory Fee Comparison Scenarios 2026 and CSV dataset.
Corporate Finance Institute’s Lehman Formula overview explains the original and modified structures. Investopedia’s Lehman Formula guide also notes that the formula has been adapted over time as deal sizes changed.
Why The Cap Matters
Without a cap, a success fee keeps rising with enterprise value even when the advisor’s incremental work may not rise proportionately.
| Deal size | Lyndon fee | Effective rate |
|---|---|---|
| US$10M | US$200,000 | 2.00% |
| US$25M | US$300,000 | 1.20% |
| US$50M | US$300,000 | 0.60% |
| US$100M | US$300,000 | 0.30% |
That does not mean sellers should choose the lowest fee blindly. A low fee is only good if the advisor still does the work that protects value. Read Lower M&A Advisory Fees Without Lower Quality for that distinction.
What To Check In A Lehman-Style Proposal
| Term | Seller question |
|---|---|
| Formula bands | Are the bands US$1M, US$5M, US$10M, or another scale? |
| Cap | Is there a maximum dollar fee? |
| Minimum fee | Does a floor override the formula on smaller deals? |
| Retainer | Is it credited against the success fee, or paid in addition? |
| Expenses | Are travel, data room, research, and admin costs recharged? |
| Tail | Which buyers create fee exposure after termination? |
| Fee basis | Is the fee based on enterprise value, equity value, debt assumed, earnout, rollover, or total consideration? |
| Payment trigger | Is payment due only at closing, or earlier at signing or LOI? |
Axial’s 2026 M&A Fee Guide is useful because it shows how lower-middle-market advisors vary across engagement fees, success fees, capital raising mandates, and expense reimbursement. The practical takeaway is simple: compare all-in economics, not only the headline percentage.
Scope Still Matters
A capped fee is not enough if the advisor removes the work that creates buyer confidence.
| Workstream | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Valuation | Frames buyer expectations before offers arrive |
| Teaser and CIM | Gives buyers a professional basis to underwrite interest |
| Financial model | Supports EBITDA normalization, growth assumptions, and diligence |
| Investment story | Explains strategic value and buyer-specific upside |
| Buyer map | Prevents reliance on a public listing or obvious buyer list |
| Targeted outreach | Creates competitive tension under confidentiality |
| Negotiation and diligence | Protects price, structure, conditions, timing, and closing certainty |
The IBBA and M&A Source Market Pulse covers lower-middle-market sale processes where brokers, boutiques, and M&A advisors overlap. In that market, fee structure should be compared together with buyer reach and execution scope.
“The problem with fee formulas is not that they are inherently wrong. It is that many sellers never convert them into dollars at their expected sale value. Once they do, a capped success fee is easier to understand and easier to compare against the work actually being delivered.”
- Daniel Bae, Founder & CEO, Lyndon Advisory
Lyndon vs A Retainer Plus Lehman Proposal
| Line item | Retainer plus Lehman proposal | Lyndon Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Success fee | Formula-based, often uncapped | 2% of enterprise value |
| Cap | Often none unless negotiated | US$300,000 |
| Retainer | Common | None |
| Monthly fee | Common | None |
| Expense recharge | Often separate | None |
| Payment trigger | Check signing, closing, and tail terms | Closing only |
| Scope | Must be confirmed | Full sell-side advisory process |
The safest comparison is net proceeds after all advisor economics and deal costs. Use M&A Advisor Fees and Seller Net Proceeds and the fee calculator before signing.
Practical Next Step
| Situation | Best next step |
|---|---|
| You received a Lehman-style proposal | Compare M&A advisor fee proposals |
| You want to model fee dollars | Use the fee calculator |
| You want Lyndon’s published terms | Review Lyndon fees |
| You want to know whether your business fits | Submit a confidential valuation inquiry |
For related reading, see M&A Advisory Fees, M&A Advisory Fee Comparison Scenarios 2026, M&A Advisor Success Fee Percentage, M&A Advisor Fee Cap vs Minimum Fee, and Capped Success Fee M&A Advisor.
About the Author

Daniel Bae
Co-founder & CEO, Lyndon Advisory
Daniel is an investment banker with 15+ years of experience in M&A, having advised on deals worth over US$30 billion. His career spans Citi, Moelis, Nomura, and ANZ across London, Hong Kong, and Sydney. He holds a combined Commerce/Law degree from the University of New South Wales. Daniel founded Lyndon Advisory to solve the pain points in M&A, enabling bankers to focus on what matters most — delivering trusted advice to clients.
About Lyndon Advisory
Lyndon Advisory is an M&A advisory firm built for Asia Pacific. We help business owners sell their companies and investors make strategic acquisitions with senior-led execution, disciplined process management, and structured buyer research. For owners, the first step is a confidential review of valuation range, likely buyer universe, and whether a structured sell-side process is justified.
Request a confidential seller reviewTopic cluster
Explore this topic
M&A Intelligence
Get M&A insights delivered
Buyer mapping strategies, market analysis, and Asia Pacific M&A insights — straight to your inbox.